Rethinking ESG Cost Accounting under Carbon Regulation: Toward an Integrated Model of Recognition, Measurement, and Reporting
Keywords:
ESG cost accounting, affective computing, recognition, measurement, reporting, case studyAbstract
The accelerating transition toward low-carbon development has intensified the need for enterprises to treat environmental, social, and governance (ESG) costs as material financial items rather than discretionary disclosures. However, existing studies often conceptualize ESG costs qualitatively, lack standardized recognition principles, and offer limited empirical evidence on how carbon policy pressures shape accounting practices. To address these gaps, this paper develops an integrated framework for ESG cost accounting under carbon regulation, linking recognition, measurement, and reporting through a three-layer model encompassing institutional pressures, organizational strategies, and micro-level accounting practices. Methodologically, the study employs a combination of literature review, cross-jurisdictional comparison, and multiple case studies of ArcelorMittal, Shell, and Heidelberg Materials during 2023-2025, drawing on corporate reports, regulatory filings, and assurance statements. Findings indicate that firms are increasingly embedding ESG costs into financial reporting, albeit with divergent recognition approaches, hybrid measurement models that combine historical cost and scenario-based fair value, and evolving assurance practices. These results contribute to academic debates by reconciling conservatism with forward-looking relevance, while offering practical guidance for firms, regulators, and auditors to enhance transparency, comparability, and credibility in ESG cost accounting.
References
1. J. Liu, S. Lau, S. S. Liu, and Y. Hu, "How firm's commitment to ESG drives green and low-carbon transition: A longitudinal case study from hang lung properties," Sustainability, vol. 16, no. 2, p. 711, 2024. doi: 10.3390/su16020711
2. F. Clora, W. Yu, and E. Corong, "Alternative carbon border adjustment mechanisms in the European Union and international responses: aggregate and within-coalition results," Energy Policy, vol. 174, p. 113454, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2023.113454
3. M. B. Dasinapa, "The integration of sustainability and ESG accounting into corporate reporting practices," Advances in Applied Accounting Research, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 13-25, 2024. doi: 10.60079/aaar.v2i1.167
4. C. Del Gesso, and R. N. Lodhi, "Theories underlying environmental, social and governance (ESG) disclosure: a systematic review of accounting studies," Journal of Accounting Literature, vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 433-461, 2025. doi: 10.1108/jal-08-2023-0143
5. Y. K. Tumewang, C. G. Ntim, and F. Haque, "Task Force on ClimateRelated Financial Disclosures: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda," Business Strategy and the Environment, 2025. doi: 10.1002/bse.70112
6. J. Wang and P. Wang, "Research on the path of enterprise strategic transformation under the background of enterprise re-form," in Mod. Econ. Manag. Forum, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 462–464, 2025, doi: 10.32629/memf.v6i3.4035.
7. M. A. Syam, S. Djaddang, A. Adam, E. E. Merawati, and M. Roziq, "Carbon accounting: Its implications on accounting prac-tices and corporate sustainability reports," International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, vol. 14, no. 4, p. 178, 2024.
8. N. C. Onat, J. Mandouri, M. Kucukvar, A. A. Kutty, and A. A. Al‐Muftah, "Driving Sustainable Business Practices With Car-bon Accounting and Reporting: A Holistic Framework and Empirical Analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environ-mental Management, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 2795-2814, 2025. doi: 10.1002/csr.3096
9. D. West, and D. Euler, "Back to the Future: The Impact Valuation of Net Zero Transition Plans," Available at SSRN 4684976, 2024. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.4684976
10. L. Yun, "Analyzing credit risk management in the digital age: Challenges and solutions," Economics and Management Innova-tion, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 81–92, 2025, doi: 10.71222/ps8sw070.
11. O. Boiral, M. C. Brotherton, and D. Talbot, "What you see is what you get? Building confidence in ESG disclosures for sus-tainable finance through external assurance," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 617-632, 2024.
12. A. Caglio, and P. Quattrone, "Sustainability Reporting and the Digital Stakeholder: The drive for greater sustainability dis-closure brings with it major challenges as businesses face increasing demand from stakeholders," Strategic Finance, vol. 105, no. 5, pp. 37-46, 2023.
13. X. Luo, "Reshaping coordination efficiency in the textile supply chain through intelligent scheduling technologies," Economics and Management Innovation, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2025, doi: 10.71222/ww35bp29.
14. Y. Zhao, Y. Gao, and D. Hong, "Sustainable innovation and economic resilience: Deciphering ESG ratings' role in lowering debt financing costs," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 4309-4343, 2025. doi: 10.1007/s13132-024-02129-y
15. W. K. Wong, B. H. Teh, and T. S. Hooi, "The influence of external stakeholders on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) reporting: Toward a conceptual framework for ESG disclosure," Foresight and STI Governance, vol. 17, 2023.
16. W. Cai, M. Bai, and H. Davey, "Mandatory environmental disclosure policy in the largest carbon emission country," Pacific Accounting Review, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 527-560, 2024. doi: 10.1108/par-04-2023-0055
17. A. R. Ayeni-Agbaje, O. D. Adesina, and A. I. Adebayo, "Assessment of fair value measurement for financial reporting in in-dustrial manufacturing firms in Nigeria," The Journal of Accounting and Management, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 26-41, 2024.
18. P. E. Stek, R. Lima‐de‐Oliveira, and T. Vasudhevan, "The Development of Carbon Markets in UpperMiddleIncome Coun-tries," Regulation & Governance, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 482-495, 2025. doi: 10.1111/rego.70010
