The Reconstruction of Project-Based Curriculum Guided by Core Literacy: Design and Effectiveness in Promoting Deep Learning in Students
Keywords:
Core literacy, Project-Based Learning (PBL), Deep learning, Curriculum design, Educational outcomesAbstract
Global educational reforms increasingly prioritize core competencies, with Project-Based Learning (PBL) as a key strategy for fostering transferable, deeper learning. However, a gap remains between PBL advocacy and implementation, as projects are often seen as isolated tasks rather than integral to curriculum redesign for systemic competency development. Current research insufficiently examines how PBL can systematically serve as the core structure for curriculum reconstruction to foster core literacy and deep learning. The mechanisms and outcomes of this approach remain underexplored. This study used design-based research to implement the Core Literacy-Embedded Project Cycle (CLPC) model in an 8th-grade biology unit. A mixed-methods approach compared an intervention group (n=60) with a comparison group (n=60), using pre-post tests, scenario-based tasks, project analysis, classroom observations, and reflective journals. The reconstructed curriculum led to equivalent gains in foundational knowledge but significantly better performance in knowledge transfer and application for the intervention group. Qualitative data showed increases in metacognitive engagement, reasoning, and collaboration, alongside challenges in time allocation and teacher facilitation. This study provides the validated CLPC model, demonstrating that integrating core literacy and PBL promotes deep learning without sacrificing content mastery. It offers practical insights for educators and suggests future research into cross-disciplinary applications and long-term impact studies.References
1. J. Mangtani, "Pedagogical, andragogical, and heutagogical approaches," in *Instructional Design Unleashed: Unlocking Professional Learning Potential with UX, Agile and AI Methods*, 2024, pp. 155-250. doi: 10.1007/979-8-8688-0416-8_4
2. Gao and S. H. Mohamad, "Student-Centered Teaching Reform in Higher Education: Fostering Competencies for the Future," Technology, vol. 6, p. 7.
3. Omelianenko and N. Artyukhova, "Project-based learning: Theoretical overview and practical implications for local innovation-based development," Economics and Education, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 35-41, 2024. doi: 10.30525/2500-946x/2024-1-6
4. Guo and H. Yu, "Exploring Project-Based Learning in English Teaching for the Development of Core Literacy in Primary and Secondary Education: Effective Strategies to Enhance Students' Comprehensive Skills," Frontiers in Educational Research, vol. 6, no. 17, pp. 20-26, 2023.
5. S. Levine and S. Viano, "Promising Practices of Out-of-School Time Programs for Low-Income Adolescents: A Systematic Review," Journal of Adolescence, vol. 97, no. 5, pp. 1145-1160, 2025. doi: 10.1002/jad.12506
6. Krajcik and N. Shin, "Student conceptions, conceptual change, and learning progressions," in Handbook of Research on Science Education, 2023, pp. 121-157. doi: 10.4324/9780367855758-7
7. S. Kim, M. A. Burkhauser, J. E. Relyea, J. B. Gilbert, E. Scherer, J. Fitzgerald, and J. McIntyre, "A longitudinal randomized trial of a sustained content literacy intervention from first to second grade: Transfer effects on students' reading comprehension," Journal of Educational Psychology, vol. 115, no. 1, p. 73, 2023.
8. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, Y. Q. Tan, and V. Pandey, "Redefining learning: student-centered strategies for academic and personal growth," in Frontiers in Education, February 2025, p. 1518602. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2025.1518602
9. Shanmugam, M. M. Cheepu, M. G. Perumal, and U. M. Krishnamoorthy, "Bridging Tradition and Innovation: A Thoughtful Approach to Future-Ready Education," in 2025 ASEE North Central Section (NCS) Annual Conference, March 2025.
10. U. I. Hong, Z. H. U. Jiahua, and Z. H. A. N. G. Xiuhong, "An analysis of STEAM project-based learning: A perspective of key competencies," Journal of East China Normal University (Educational Sciences), vol. 35, no. 4, p. 54, 2017.
11. C. Tseng, "On Competency-Based Curriculum and Instruction Through Project-Based Learning Based on the Empirical Evidences of the Implementation of 21st Century Skills," Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 85-106, 2019.
12. Gumartifa, I. Syahri, R. A. Siroj, M. Nurrahmi, and N. Yusof, "Perception of Teachers Regarding Problem-Based Learning and Traditional Method in the Classroom Learning Innovation Process," Indonesian Journal on Learning and Advanced Education (IJOLAE), pp. 151-166, 2023. doi: 10.23917/ijolae.v5i2.20714
13. C. Chang, "The Possibilities of Design and Implementation of Competency-Based Instruction by Using Problem-Based Learning," Journal of Curriculum Studies, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 43-58, 2018.
14. Shen and C. S. Chang, "Implementation of the flipped classroom approach for promoting college students' deeper learning," Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1323-1347, 2023.
15. Samoshkina, "Applied learning in higher education: Bridging the gap between theory and practice," in *Proceedings of The International Conference on Modern Research in Education, Teaching and Learning*, 2024, pp. 25-34. doi: 10.33422/icmetl.v3i1.271
16. E. Hernández, L. Darling-Hammond, J. Adams, K. Bradley, and D. Duncan-Grand, "Pushing against the grain: Networks and their systems for sustaining and spreading deeper learning," Journal of Educational Change, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 871-895, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s10833-022-09467-1
17. Danker, "Using flipped classroom approach to explore deep learning in large classrooms," IAFOR Journal of Education, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 171-186, 2015. doi: 10.22492/ije.3.1.10
18. Rafiq-uz-Zaman, "Teacher training needs for skill-based education: A review of competencies, barriers, and professional development gaps," Inverge Journal of Social Sciences, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 166-182, 2023. doi: 10.63544/ijss.v2i3.212
