Optimization Analysis of Stability and Deformation Control Methods for Deep Excavation Support Structures Based on Field Measurements
Keywords:
deep excavation, support structure optimization, field instrumentation, deformation control, Bayesian calibration, adaptive designAbstract
Deep excavation support systems in urban environments present demanding engineering challenges due to their inherent stability risks and potential for inducing detrimental deformations in adjacent infrastructure. Conventional design methodologies often inadequately address the complex soil-structure interaction dynamics and temporal construction effects, leading to either excessive conservatism or unforeseen performance issues. This study develops an integrated optimization framework that synergistically combines high-frequency field instrumentation data with advanced computational modeling to enhance the stability and deformation control of deep excavation support structures. The proposed methodology employs a physics-informed Bayesian calibration approach to continuously update finite element models using real-time measurements from inclinometers, strain gauges, and piezometers. A multi-objective optimization algorithm subsequently identifies optimal support configurations that simultaneously maximize stability margins, minimize deformation, and reduce material costs. Validation through a major metropolitan excavation case study demonstrates that this field measurement-driven approach achieves significant improvements in deformation control while maintaining structural integrity. The framework's ability to adaptively refine support designs during construction phases offers substantial advancements over static design paradigms. By transforming conventional excavation support into a responsive, data-informed process, this research provides a foundation for intelligent infrastructure development in spatially constrained urban environments.References
1. B. K. Pandey, S. Rajesh, and S. Chandra, "Numerical evaluation of geogrid-encased stone columns in soft soil under embankment loading," In Geo-Congress 2020, February, 2020, pp. 543-551. doi: 10.1061/9780784482780.053
2. R. W. Cheung, "Landslide risk management in Hong Kong," Landslides, vol. 18, no. 10, pp. 3457-3473, 2021.
3. M. Maral, "EVALUATION OF THE SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF A CIRCULAR TUNNEL IN HETEROGENEOUS SOIL BY USING DIFFERENT APPROACHES (Doctoral dissertation, Politecnico di Torino)," 2024.
4. E. Yaghoubi, E. Yaghoubi, A. Khamees, and A. H. Vakili, "A systematic review and meta-analysis of artificial neural network, machine learning, deep learning, and ensemble learning approaches in field of geotechnical engineering," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 36, no. 21, pp. 12655-12699, 2024. doi: 10.1007/s00521-024-09893-7
5. H. Mohamad, A. A. A. Beddelee, M. F. Ghazali, H. E. Lee, K. Chaiyasarn, and M. Y. M. Nasir, "Distributed fibre optic inclinometer with cloud-based monitoring system," Engineering Science and Technology, an International Journal, vol. 41, p. 101406, 2023. doi: 10.1016/j.jestch.2023.101406
6. P. Li, Y. Zhu, Z. J. Cao, L. Y. Zhang, and R. Zhang, "Bayesian Updating of Serviceability Reliability for Maximum Ground Settlement Induced by Braced Excavations Using Multiple Empirical Models," ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering, vol. 11, no. 4, p. 04025053, 2025.
7. S. Sharma, and S. Sen, "Real-time structural damage assessment using LSTM networks: regression and classification approaches," Neural Computing and Applications, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 557-572, 2023. doi: 10.1007/s00521-022-07773-6
8. G. Biondi, D. Cazzuffi, N. Moraci, and C. Soccodato, "Geosynthetics: Leading the Way to a Resilient Planet: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 12TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON GEOSYNTHETICS (12ICG), SEPTEMBER 17-21, 2023, ROMA, ITALY," CRC Press, 2023.
9. A. Tabaroei, V. Sarfarazi, M. Pouraminian, and D. Mohammadzadeh, "Evaluation of behavior of a deep excavation by three-dimensional numerical modeling," Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 967-977, 2022.
10. Y. M. Cheng, C. W. Law, and L. Liu, "Analysis, design and construction of foundations," CRC Press, 2024. doi: 10.1201/9781032650586
11. M. Scheiter, A. P. Valentine, and M. Sambridge, "Bayesian Inference in Geophysics with AI-enhanced Markov chain Monte Carlo," Authorea Preprints, 2024. doi: 10.22541/essoar.172854555.54637562/v1
12. G. Ofori, Z. Zhang, and F. Y. Ling, "Key barriers to increase construction productivity: The Singapore case," International journal of construction management, vol. 22, no. 14, pp. 2635-2646, 2022.
13. J. K. Furtney, C. Thielsen, W. Fu, and R. Le Goc, "Surrogate models in rock and soil mechanics: Integrating numerical modeling and machine learning," Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 2845-2859, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s00603-021-02720-8
14. C. Zhu, X. Huang, C. Xu, G. Yan, J. Guo, and Q. Liang, "Displacement Response Characteristics and Instability Risk Assessment of Excavation Face in Deep-Buried Shield Tunnel," Buildings, vol. 15, no. 14, p. 2561, 2025. doi: 10.3390/buildings15142561
15. T. Wang, Y. Huang, Y. Liu, and C. Chen, "Data privacy preserving for centralized robotic fault diagnosis with modified dataset distillation," Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, vol. 24, no. 10, p. 101005, 2024. doi: 10.1115/1.4066096
16. G. Gallios, N. Tsakiridis, and N. Tziolas, "Federated learning applications in soil spectroscopy," Geoderma, vol. 456, p. 117259, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2025.117259
17. A. A. Firoozi, A. A. Firoozi, K. Aati, A. H. Khan, and V. Vambol, "Integrating the Fourth Industrial Revolution into Geotechnical Engineering: Transformations, Challenges, and Future Directions," Ecological Questions, vol. 36, no. 1, pp. 1-41, 2025. doi: 10.12775/eq.2025.012
